Lavoisier S.A.S.
14 rue de Provigny
94236 Cachan cedex
FRANCE

Heures d'ouverture 08h30-12h30/13h30-17h30
Tél.: +33 (0)1 47 40 67 00
Fax: +33 (0)1 47 40 67 02


Url canonique : www.lavoisier.fr/livre/sciences-humaines-et-sociales/re-defining-racism/descriptif_4259891
Url courte ou permalien : www.lavoisier.fr/livre/notice.asp?ouvrage=4259891

(Re-)Defining Racism, 1st ed. 2020 A Philosophical Analysis African American Philosophy and the African Diaspora Series

Langue : Anglais
Couverture de l’ouvrage (Re-)Defining Racism

What is racism? is a timely question that is hotly contested in the philosophy of race. Yet disagreement about racism?s nature does not begin in philosophy, but in the sociopolitical domain. Alberto G. Urquidez argues that philosophers of race have failed to pay sufficient attention to the practical considerations that prompt the question ?What is racism?? Most theorists assume that ?racism? signifies a language-independent phenomenon that needs to be ?discovered? by the relevant science or ?uncovered? by close scrutiny of everyday usage of this term. (Re-)Defining Racism challenges this metaphysical paradigm. Urquidez develops a Wittgenstein-inspired framework that illuminates the use of terms like ?definition,? ?meaning,? ?explanation of meaning,? and ?disagreement,? for the analysis of contested normative concepts. These elucidations reveal that providing a definition of ?racism? amounts to recommending a form of moral representation?a rule for the correct use of ?racism.? As definitional recommendations must be justified on pragmatic grounds, Urquidez takes as a starting point for justification the interests of racism's historical victims.

Part I: Racism Without Ontology

 

Ch.1. Introduction: Summary of the Argument


Ch. 2. Introduction: Toward a Conventionalist Framework

 

Ch. 3. Re-defining “Definition”: An Argument for Conventionalism

 

Ch. 4. Re-defining “Meaning”: Defending Semantic Internalism Over Externalism

 

Part II: Theorizing Conceptual Disagreement

 

Ch. 5. Re-defining “Disagreement”: Rationality Without Final Solutions

 

Ch. 6. Re-defining “Philosophical Analysis”: Not Descriptive Analysis, Or Conservatism, But Pragmatic Revisionism

 

Part III: Toward a Prescriptive Theory of Racism

 

Ch. 7. Adequacy Conditions for a Prescriptive Theory of Racism: Toward an Oppression-Centered Account

 

Ch. 8. Racial Oppression and Grammatical Pluralism: A Critique of Jorge Garcia on Racist belief

 

Ch. 9. Concluding Note


Alberto G. Urquidez is currently a CFD Postdoctoral Fellow in Philosophy at Bowdoin College, USA. .

Analyzes the concept of racism from a philosophical perspective

Develops a Wittgenstein-inspired framework that illuminates the use of terms, like “definition,” “meaning,” “explanation of meaning,” and “disagreement,” in respect to contested normative concepts

Written for philosophers of race and racism, philosophers of language and Wittgensteinian philosophers, and metaphilosophers interested in the nature of conceptual analysis

Date de parution :

Ouvrage de 421 p.

14.8x21 cm

Disponible chez l'éditeur (délai d'approvisionnement : 15 jours).

84,39 €

Ajouter au panier

Date de parution :

Ouvrage de 421 p.

14.8x21 cm

Disponible chez l'éditeur (délai d'approvisionnement : 15 jours).

Prix indicatif 84,39 €

Ajouter au panier