Choosing Methods in Mental Health Research Mental Health Research from Theory to Practice
Coordonnateurs : Slade Mike, Priebe Stefan
Choosing Methods in Mental Health Research develops a new framework for mental health research. It is concerned with how to choose the most appropriate mental health research method, not only to address a specific question, but to maximize the potential impact on shaping mental health care.
Mike Slade and Stefan Priebe focus attention on the types of audience that the researcher is seeking to influence, the types of evidence each audience accepts as valid, and the relative strengths and limitations of each type of methodology. A range of research methodologies are described and critically appraised, and the use of evidence by different groups is discussed. This produces some important findings about the interplay between research production and consumption, and highlights directions for future mental health research theory and practice.
The findings presented here will be relevant to mental health service users and professionals who use research evidence to inform decision-making. It will also prove an invaluable resource for students and researchers in the field of mental health.
Goldberg, Foreword. Slade, Priebe, Preface. Part I:Research Methods. Slade, Priebe, Who is Research For? Wilson, Single Case Experimental Designs. McCabe, Conversation Analysis. Harper, Discourse Analysis. Henwood, Grounded Theory. Wessely, Randomised Controlled Trials. Gilbody, Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. Jenkins, Meltzer, Brugha, Gupta, Surveys. Part II:Consumers of Research. Walters, Tylee, Influencing Practice at Primary Care Level. Burns, Influencing Community Mental Health Team Practice to Improve Care Outcomes. Pinfold, Thornicroft, Influencing the Public Perception of Mental Illness. Petit-Zeman, Influencing the Media. Holloway, Influencing Policy in the United Kingdom. Puschner, Kunze, Becker, Influencing Policy in Germany. Burti, Influencing Policy in Italy. Hansson, Influencing Policy in Sweden. Lyons, Witt, Influencing Policy in the United States. Part III: Generating High-impact Research. Busfield, The Evidence Context in Mental Health Research. Beresford, A Service User Perspective on Evidence. Bracken, Thomas, Postmodern Mental Health Services. Priebe, Slade, Research Production and Consumption.
Mike Slade is Clinical Senior Lecturer in the Health Services Research Department at the Institute of Psychiatry and a Consultant Clinical Psychologist in Rehabilitation, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust
Stefan Priebe is Professor of Social and Community Psychiatry at Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary, University of London. He has published widely on concepts, therapeutic processes and outcomes in mental health care.
Date de parution : 05-2015
15.6x23.4 cm
Date de parution : 07-2006
Ouvrage de 288 p.
15.6x23.4 cm
Thème de Choosing Methods in Mental Health Research :
Mots-clés :
Mental Health; Mental Health Services Research; services; Mental Health Policy; policy; Mental Health Research; service; Clinical Practice; evidence-based; Assertive Community Treatment; medicine; Severe Mental Illness; severe; Mental Health Service Users; illness; West Germany; users; Mental Illness; assertive; Single Case Experimental Designs; community; Evidence Based Medicine; Vice Versa; Community Mental Health Centre Movement; Quantitative Research; Mental Health Policy Document; Aba Design; Chronic; Wakefield; Grounded Theory; Grounded Theory Studies; Generic Community Mental Health Team; Patient Intervention Level; Primary Care Mental Health; Part Iii