Law and Politics of Constitutional Courts Indonesia and the Search for Judicial Heroes Comparative Constitutionalism in Muslim Majority States Series
Auteur : Hendrianto Stefanus
This book critically evaluates different models of judicial leadership in Indonesia to examine the impact that individual chief justices can have on the development of constitutional courts. It explores the importance of this leadership as a factor explaining the dynamic of judicial power. Drawing on an Aristotelean model of heroism and the established idea of judicial heroes to explore the types of leadership that judges can exercise, it illustrates how Indonesia?s recent experience offers a stark contrast between the different models. First, a prudential-minimalist heroic chief justice who knows how to enhance the Court?s authority while fortifying the Court?s status by playing a minimalist role in policy areas. Second, a bold and aggressive heroic chief justice, employing an ambitious constitutional interpretation. The third model is a soldier-type chief justice, who portrays himself as a subordinate of the Executive and Legislature. Contrary perhaps to expectations, the book?s findings show a more cautious initial approach to be the most effective. The experience of Indonesia clearly illustrates the importance of heroic judicial leadership and how the approach chosen by a court can have serious consequences for its success. This book will be a valuable resource for those interested in the law and politics of Indonesia, comparative constitutional law, and comparative judicial politics.
Part I: Foundations
Introduction; 1. Theorizing Judicial Heroes;
Part II: The First Generation Court
2. The Birth of the Constitutional Court: A Joke that turned Serious; 3. A Heroic Intellectual Leadership; 4. (Un)Heroic Quasi-Weak-Form Review; 5. A Heroic Social Leadership;
Part III: The Second Generation Court
6. After the Heroic Court: The Second Generation Decline? 7. Miscarriage of Chief Justices: The Anti-Heroes; 8: A Good Hero is Hard to Find: Towards a Less Heroic Court?
Part IV: Conclusions
9. Conclusion: The "Heroic Judicial Leadership" and "Second Generation Decline" in Comparative Perspective.
Stefanus Hendrianto is a Jesuit and legal scholar. In recent years, he served as a visiting professor at Santa Clara University School of Law and a guest scholar at the Kellogg Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame. Currently, he is a scholar at Boston College, School of Theology and Ministry. He holds a PhD degree from the University of Washington School of Law in Seattle and an LLM from Utrecht University in the Netherlands, in addition to his LLB degree from Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia.
Date de parution : 08-2020
15.6x23.4 cm
Date de parution : 04-2018
15.6x23.4 cm
Thèmes de Law and Politics of Constitutional Courts :
Mots-clés :
Indonesian Constitutional Court; Jimly Asshiddiqie; Constitutional Law; Indonesia; Judicial Activism; Activist Court; Chief Justice Asshiddqie; Chief Justice Mahfud; weak-form judicial review; Chief Justice Asshiddiqie; Hendrianto Stefanus; Constitutional Court Justices; Akil Mochtar; Judicial Hero; Constitutional Court; Electricity Law Case; Ultra Petita; Judicial Leadership; Arief Hidayat; Weak Form Judicial Review; South Korean Constitutional Court; Anti-Corruption Court; Honorary Council; Direct Political Attack; JD Degree; Hungarian Constitutional Court; Article 28J; Heroic Courts; House Judiciary Committee; Constitutional Complaint; Tax Amnesty Program; Tax Amnesty; Pandawa Brothers