Presidential Saber Rattling Causes and Consequences

The founders of the American republic believed presidents should be wise and virtuous statesmen consistently advocating community interests when conducting American foreign policy. Yet the most common theoretical model used today for explaining the behavior of politicians is grounded in self-interest, rather than community interest. This book investigates whether past presidents acted as noble statesmen or were driven by such self-interested motivations as re-election, passion, partisanship, media frenzy and increasing domestic support. The book also examines the consequences for the nation of presidential behavior driven by self-interest. Between 1945 and 2008, presidents issued 4,269 threats to nineteen different countries. Professor B. Dan Wood evaluates the causes and consequences of these threats, revealing the nature of presidential foreign policy representation and its consistency with the founding fathers' intentions.

1. Presidential saber rattling in the early American republic; 2. Presidential saber rattling and presidential representation; 3. Measuring presidential saber rattling; 4. The causes of presidential saber rattling; 5. The domestic consequences of presidential saber rattling; 6. The foreign policy consequences of presidential saber rattling; 7. The Bush war on terror and presidential foreign policy representation; 8. Wisdom, virtue, and presidential foreign policy representation.

B. Dan Wood is Professor and Director of the American Politics Program at Texas A&M University. He is the author of The Myth of Presidential Representation (Cambridge University Press, 2009), The Politics of Economic Leadership: The Causes and Consequences of Presidential Rhetoric (2007) and co-author of Bureaucratic Dynamics: The Role of Bureaucracy in a Democracy (1994).