1 / Introduction.- 1.1 Previous literature on pumping test interpretation.- 1.2 Proposed generalized interpretation method.- 1.3 Additional aims of the book.- 1.4 Arrangement of subject matter.- 2 / Hydraulic Parameters.- 2.1 Hydraulic parameters describing water conducting properties.- 2.1.1 Darcy’s law.- 2.1.2 Hydraulic head and fresh water head.- 2.1.3 Intrinsic permeability.- 2.1.4 Heterogeneity and anisotropy of geological formations with respect to hydraulic conductivity.- 2.1.4.1 Heterogeneity.- 2.1.4.2 Anisotropy.- 2.1.5 Generalized law of Darcy.- 2.1.6 Hydraulic conductivity ellipsoid.- 2.1.7 Classification of layers according to their water conductive properties.- 2.1.8 Hydraulic parameters derived from hydraulic conductivity.- 2.1.8.1 Transmissivity.- 2.1.8.2 Hydraulic resistance.- 2.1.8.3 Leakage factor.- 2.1.9 Methods to derive the hydraulic conductivity.- 2.1.9.1 Direct methods.- 2.1.9.2 Indirect methods.- 2.2 Hydraulic parameters describing water storing properties.- 2.2.1 Conservation of mass in a completely saturated volume of material fixed in space.- 2.2.2 Specific elastic storage.- 2.2.2.1 Compressibility of water.- 2.2.2.2 Effective stress concept.- 2.2.2.3 Compressibility of matrix.- 2.2.2.4 Movement of solids in deforming medium.- 2.2.3 Hydraulic parameters derived from specific elastic storage.- 2.2.3.1 Elastic storage coefficient.- 2.2.3.2 Diffusivity.- 2.2.4 Methods to derive specific elastic storage.- 2.2.4.1 Direct methods.- 2.2.4.2 Indirect methods.- 2.2.5 Storage coefficient near the water table.- 2.2.6 Hydraulic parameters derived from storage coefficient near watertable.- 2.2.7 Methods to derive storage coefficient near water table.- 2.2.7.1 Determination by pF-curves.- 2.2.7.2 Determination by pumping tests.- 2.2.7.3 Determination by inverse models of unsteady state flow.- 3 / Evolution of analytical models of pumping tests and their interpretation methods.- 3.1 Model of Thiem.- 3.1.1 Introduction.- 3.1.2 Derivation of basic differential equation.- 3.1.3 Solution of basic differential equation.- 3.1.4 Application of Thiem method.- 3.2 Model of Theis.- 3.2.1 Introduction.- 3.2.2 Derivation of basic differential equation.- 3.2.3 Solution of basic differential equation for constant discharge rate.- 3.2.4 Theis and Cooper-Jacob interpretation methods.- 3.2.5 Comments concerning Theis and Cooper-Jacob interpretation methods.- 3.3 Model of Jacob-Hantush.- 3.3.1 Introduction.- 3.3.2 Derivation of basic differential equation.- 3.3.3 Solution of basic differential equation for a constant discharge rate.- 3.3.4 Interpretation methods of De Glee, Hantush-Jacob, Hantush I-II and Walton.- 3.3.4.1 Interpretation of distance-drawdown curve at steady flow.- 3.3.4.2 Interpretation of time-drawdown curve.- 3.3.4.3 Comments concerning interpretation methods of semi-confined aquifer.- 3.4 Model of Hantush.- 3.4.1 Introduction.- 3.4.2 Derivation of basic differential equations.- 3.4.3 Initial and boundary conditions.- 3.4.4 Solution of basic differential equation.- 3.4.5 Interpretation methods derived from Hantush model.- 3.4.5.1 Interpretation of first part of time-drawdown curves.- 3.4.5.2 Interpretation of last part of time-drawdown curves.- 3.4.5.3 Interpretation of maximum drawdowns of cases 1 and 3.- 3.4.6 Concluding considerations about interpretation methods derived from Hantush model.- 3.5 Model of Hantush-Weeks.- 3.6 Model of Boulton-Cooley.- 3.7 Model of Neuman and Witherspoon.- 3.8 Retrospective view on analytical models and their derived interpretation methods.- 4 / Numerical model of pumping tests in a layered groundwater reservoir.- 4.1 Finite-difference grid.- 4.2 Mean drawdowns.- 4.2.1 Mean drawdown over horizontal plane through nodal circle in ring.- 4.2.2 Mean drawdown over cylindrical surface through nodal circle in ring.- 4.2.3 Mean drawdown over entire ring volume.- 4.2.4 Mean drawdown during a time step.- 4.3 Continuity equation in numerical model.- 4.3.1 Mean velocities through boundary surfaces of rings.- 4.3.2 Storage change in rings.- 4.3.3 In- and outflow difference of rings.- 4.3.4 Continuity equation for rings.- 4.3.5 Storage change for rings bounded by water table.- 4.3.6 In- and outflow difference of rings bounded by water table.- 4.3.7 Continuity equation for rings bounded by water table.- 4.4 Initial and boundary conditions.- 4.5 Solution of the numerical equations.- 4.5.1 Alternating direction implicit method.- 4.5.2 Verification of iteration process and number of iteration per time step.- 4.6 Verification of numerical model.- 4.6.1 Verification of numerical model with Theis model.- 4.6.2 Influence of grid parameters on results of numerical Theis model.- 4.6.3 Verification of numerical model with Jacob-Hantush model.- 4.6.4 Influence of grid parameters on results of Jacob-Hantush model.- 4.6.5 Verification of numerical model with Hantush model.- 4.6.6 Examination of validity limits of the Hantush asymptotic solution.- 4.6.7 Verification of numerical model with Hantush-Weeks model.- 4.6.8 Verification of numerical model with Boulton-Cooley model.- 4.6.9 Consequences of numerical model verification.- 4.7 Program package for numerical simulation of pumping tests.- 4.7.1 Program infinp.- 4.7.1.1 Input space-time grid parameters and hydraulic parameters.- 4.7.1.2 Input of observed drawdowns.- 4.7.3 Program sipur5.- 4.7.4 Program outpu5.- 4.7.5 Program sidap7.- 5 / Further developments of pumping test model.- 5.1 Drawdown of pumping tests with variable discharge rate.- 5.1.1 Theoretical considerations.- 5.1.2 Additional input data.- 5.1.3 Example of a pumping test with variable discharge rate.- 5.2 Drawdown in a laterally anisotropic aquifer.- 5.2.1 Theoretical considerations.- 5.2.2 Additional input data.- 5.2.3 Example of a pumping test in a laterally anisotropic aquifer.- 5.3 Drawdown in pumping wells.- 5.3.1 Theoretical considerations.- 5.3.2 Additional input data.- 5.3.3 Example of drawdowns in a pumped well during a step drawdown test.- 5.4 Drawdown due to a multiple well field.- 5.4.1 Theoretical considerations.- 5.4.2 Additional input data.- 5.4.3 Drawdown due to pumping on wells in laterally isotropic layers.- 5.4.4 Drawdown due to pumping on wells in laterally anisotropic layers.- 5.5 Drawdown in groundwater reservoir with lateral bounds.- 5.5.1 Drawdown in groundwater reservoir with lateral impervious boundary.- 5.5.2 Drawdown in groundwater reservoir with lateral constant head boundary.- 5.5.3 Drawdown in groundwater reservoir bounded by several straight boundaries.- 5.6 Drawdown in groundwater reservoir with lateral discontinuous conductivity change.- 5.6.1 Theoretical considerations.- 5.6.2 Additional input data.- 5.6.3 Example of drawdown approximation.- 5.7 Land subsidence due to groundwater withdrawal.- 5.7.1 Theoretical considerations.- 5.7.2 Additional input data and representation of results.- 5.7.3 Example of subsidence calculations.- 6 / Inverse model as tool for pumping test interpretation.- 6.1 Residual vector.- 6.1.1 Definition.- 6.1.2 Contributing factors of residuals.- 6.2 Sensitivity matrix —.- 6.2.1 Definition.- 6.2.2 Program package to calculate sensitivity matrix.- 6.2.3 Example of a sensitivity matrix.- 6.2.4 Graphical representation of sensitivities.- 6.3 Numerical nonlinear regression.- 6.3.1 Optimal values of hydraulic parameters.- 6.3.2 Uniqueness, identifiability and stability.- 6.3.3 Analysis of residuals.- 6.3.4 Joint confidence region of hydraulic parameters.- 6.3.4.1 Joint confidence region approximated by p-dimensional ellipsoid.- 6.3.4.2 Cross sections through joint confidence region.- 6.3.5 Condition indexes and matrix of marginal variance-decomposition proportions.- 6.3.6 Practical steps in interpretation by means of inverse model.- 6.4 Validation of inverse numerical model.- 6.5 Factors influencing accuracy of results.- 6.5.1 Influence of flow conceptualization.- 6.5.2 Influence of observed drawdown accuracy and discharge magnitude.- 6.5.3 Influence of observation time.- 6.5.4 Influence of observation distance.- 6.5.5 Conclusions.- 6.6 Program package for the nonlinear regression.- 6.6.1 Program solpu5.- 6.6.2 Program inpur5.- 6.6.3 Program etabdi.- 6.6.4 Program plprcr.- 6.6.5 Program susqln.- 6.6.6 Program susql3.- 6.6.7 Program sumsqr.- 6.6.8 Program sumsq2.- 6.7 Confidence interval for optimal estimated drawdown.- 6.7.1 Drawdown confidence intervals based on two- and three-dimensional cross sections through joint confidence interval of hydraulic parameters.- 6.7.2 Drawdown confidence intervals derived by optimization of constrained problem.- 6.7.3 Program packages to approximate drawdown confidence intervals.- 6.7.3.1 Program package confil.- 6.7.3.2 Program package confill.- 6.7.3.3 Program package confi3.- 6.7.3.4 Program package confl4.- 6.8 Hypothetical example to demonstrate nonlinear regression and approximation of drawdown confidence intervals.- 6.8.1 Conceptual model of ‘actual’ groundwater flow.- 6.8.2 Creation of ‘observed’ drawdowns.- 6.8.3 Conceptual model of groundwater flow used during interpretation.- 6.8.4 Interpretation by means of ordinary least square method.- 6.8.5 Joint confidence area of hydraulic parameters.- 6.8.6 Combined influence of hydraulic parameters at some observation points.- 6.8.7 Approximation of drawdown confidence intervals.- 7 / Example of performance and interpretation of pumping tests.- 7.1 Double pumping test in layered groundwater reservoir formed by Quaternary sediments.- 7.1.1 Lithostratigraphical cross section.- 7.1.2 Location of pumping and observation wells.- 7.1.3 Performance of double pumping test.- 7.1.4 Discretization of groundwater reservoir in numerical model.- 7.1.5 Hydraulic parameters derived from observed drawdown.- 7.1.6 Interpretation with ordinary least square method.- 7.2 Double pumping test in a laterally anisotropic aquifer formed by fractured rocks of Palaeozoic and Mesozoic age.- 7.2.1 Lithostratigraphical cross section.- 7.2.2 Location of pumping and observation wells.- 7.2.3 Discretization of groundwater reservoir in numerical model.- 7.2.4 Drawdowns used as input data.- 7.2.5 Hydraulic parameters derived from observed drawdowns.- 7.2.6 First interpretation results.- 7.2.7 Two-dimensional cross sections through exact joint confidence region.- 7.2.8 Three-dimensional cross sections through approximate joint confidence region.- 7.2.9 Condition indexes and matrix of marginal variance-decomposition.- 7.2.10 Observational constraints for unique solution.- 7.2.11 Second interpretation phase and post-optimization.- 7.2.12 Conclusion.- 7.3 Triple pumping test in layered groundwater reservoir formed by Tertiary sediments.- 7.3.1 Lithostratigraphical cross section.- 7.3.2 Location of pumping and observation wells.- 7.3.3 Performance of triple pumping test.- 7.3.4 Discretization of groundwater reservoir in numerical model.- 7.3.5 Hydraulic parameters derived from observed drawdowns.- 7.3.6 Interpretation of results.- 7.3.7 Outliers.- 7.3.8 Conclusions.- 7.4 Single pumping test to determine the conductivity of Tertiary silty clay.- 7.4.1 Lithostratigraphical cross-section.- 7.4.2 Location of pumping and observation wells.- 7.4.3 Performance of single pumping test.- 7.4.4 Discretization of groundwater reservoir in numerical model.- 7.4.5 Hydraulic parameters derived from observed drawdown.- 7.4.6 Interpretation results.- 7.5 Artificial recharge test in a natural bare dune valley.- 7.5.1 Lithological cross section and discretization of groundwater reservoir.- 7.5.2 Location of observation wells and performance of artificial recharge test.- 7.5.3 Hydraulic parameters derived from observed rises of hydraulic head.